Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by teeveeon Sep 21, 2017 5:17pm
108 Views
Post# 26728053

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Initial Comparison of PEA Operating Costs for PLS vs Arrow

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Initial Comparison of PEA Operating Costs for PLS vs ArrowContractual arrangements do not survive bankruptcy. I am not sure there is any other way for FCU to get out from under the disasterous off take agreement with CGN. I expect a bankruptcy event, wiping out shareholder equity,  would most likley occur  during mine development due to unforseen issues and costs. 

HighROI wrote: FCU has an off-take agreement at a discount to spot!! 

A recipe for bankruptcy is producing without fixed price contracts in place. Just look at Paladin.

Greenday - (9/21/2017 4:17:47 PM) 
RE:RE:RE:Initial Comparison of PEA Operating Costs for PLS vs ArrowProducers fill their order files and then if they have any production left over they unload it on the spot market.  A main reason why FCU is ahead of NXE on the development front is because FCU has an offt-take agreement with CGN.  Would be very risky for NXE to build a mine and start producing without having contracts in place for the production. Producing without customers is a recipe for bankruptcy. wrote:


Bullboard Posts