Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Eco Oro Minerals Corp C.EOM

Alternate Symbol(s):  GYSLF

Eco Oro Minerals Corp. is a Canadian precious metals exploration and development company. The Company was focused on the development of the Angostura Project in northeastern Colombia, which consists of the main Angostura deposit and its five satellite prospects. The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Arbitration Claim became the core focus of the Company.


CSE:EOM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by GoldenOrbon Sep 22, 2017 7:09pm
76 Views
Post# 26733299

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:They say they mailing info sept 14 ?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:They say they mailing info sept 14 ?                There again Mac the vote never really amounted to much now did it?  Untried, untested & non-submtted.  What you miss is the fact that the legal costs were being traded tit for tat.  That is the true summons of the proxy battle.  Yes the vote would have been very important once we actually arrived at a "no more next motion" judical corner.  Yet I have a sense we would never have arrived at that place with every avenue of appeal brought to bear on the CS groups.  You know as well as I these types of legal battles either go on for years OR until one side runs their treasury dry. 
                 So yes the real huddle(s) would have been to actually arrive at a place where the vote could have taken place, right?  For this we owe the CS  groups for staging enough legal power to fend off a very rich Management/Majors offense which they had no intention of stopping.  Our cost was just to participate without extreme expenses, easy to see the truth from the theives.  The CS groups would have been bankrupt at some point down the road.  So thank you CS groups again.  Slippery Schiffty absurdly posts his nonsense, he should just get his head on straight & relent from his BS posts.  He's probably the only one to submit a complaint.

Bullboard Posts