RE:RE:RE:Refractory Septic Shock vs. Retweets I'd really like to understand why they do this. If there was no substance here and they knew they wouldn't get approval, they would be pumping out fake news to drive up their value so they could unload as much as possible at elevated prices. That isn't the case. They are for the most part radio silent, with 0 marketing. They are clearly intending to keep the SP artificially low. The question is why! They are a public company so they have to divulge materially-impacting agreements and activities. I dunno. Anyone?
mercedesman wrote: Biotech675 wrote: Using old data to stimulate new investment, what a good idea... if only spectral did the same. Chan is good at spinning things in a way that make them seem new and exciting but in reality those results were already published early 2016
its as if WE are generating the new & hard scientific findings ( e.g. Positive effects of endotoxin removal) and they release the " news" in the US and spin it around a few times in the process. How fun for their shareholders! ( e.g. They are up today we are down). They generate shareholder value for their shareholders using OPM ( other people's money) - namely hard earned money accepted from Spectral shareholders. They don't even have to run any costly Trials. It's a good gig....for them!
PS didn't Apple ( a US Company) steal a good idea from RIM ( a Canadian company) and out market them ?