Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Chinook Energy Inc. Common CNKEF



GREY:CNKEF - Post by User

Comment by JDavis17on Sep 28, 2017 9:29pm
205 Views
Post# 26756708

RE:RE:New comments from "Value Digger" (TOP-100 Financial Analyst)

RE:RE:New comments from "Value Digger" (TOP-100 Financial Analyst)
Bean_and_Dunn wrote:

JD accusing CKE staff of misleading shareholders when they claim payback in 1.92 years?


 I do fully expect that !P30 production will continue very very close to initial flush production. 
 


Regarding your first statement, that is a blatant lie. I never said anything even remotely like that.

Regarding your second statement, the first 9 wells had an average IP30 about 62% of the test rates. The last 3 wells of that 9 had IP30's that came in at only 43% of test rates.
So exactly what reasonaing are you using to claim that the latest wells will have an IP30 equal to the test rates? That is simply stupid and ridiculous.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>