Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Vanadiumcorp Resource Inc V.VRB

Alternate Symbol(s):  VRBFF

VanadiumCorp Resource Inc. is a Canada-based critical metals company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in Canada, with a primary focus on the exploration of the Lac Dore and Iron-T Properties in Quebec. The Company produces a stream of quality vanadium electrolytes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries (VRFB). The Iron-T Property is located in the Nord-du-Quebec administrative region in the Province of Quebec, approximately 15 kilometers (km) east of Matagami and 780 km northwest of Montreal. The Lac Dore Property is located approximately 27 km east-southeast from the City of Chibougamau, in Eeyou Istchee James Bay Territory, Nord-du-Quebec administrative region, Province of Quebec, Canada. The Lac Dore Project comprises two claim blocks, referred to as Lac Dore Main and Lac Dore North. The Lac Dore Main claims cover an area of 648.82 hectares (Ha), and the Lac Dore North claims cover an area of 4,637.87 Ha.


TSXV:VRB - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by jsnfernleyon Sep 30, 2017 10:40pm
131 Views
Post# 26763338

RE:RE:RE:Pea

RE:RE:RE:PeaIf you are referring to why the PEA announced over two years ago is late, the newer technology wasn't contemplated until fairly recently.

I don't see much reason to go into the calcination option again, and I believe that the updated capital costs for the calcination option resulted in sticker shock.  Calcination may have been the goal two years ago, I do not believe it is any longer,or at least until the results of the newer options become known and calculated out.

If the latest new money that invested in VRB isn't mounting a proxy fight, I'm more than willing to wait, as it appears they are.

I see that you referenced a PEA you were involved with, are you a director of a publicly traded company?
Bullboard Posts