RE:RE:I have a different opinionGood post, Allisgood! The picture of the truck says it all.
Why do you say: "these engineering deals all need to be done in relative conjunction with each other"
I look forward to get some more news from TIC and, especially, their mature tailings processing testing that is being done in 2017. That's 17, not 18. LOL But longs know that one must be patient with TIC.
allisgood wrote: Bubs. I am not trying to be promotionary when I say that I expect more deals to follow soon. I firmly beleive it . Of course you our entitled to your own opinions on how it will go down.
My reasoning is this. The whole concept of the way this would workbest is that there needs to be one
central mineral processing plant for all the MOSP's. It really makes no sense in my mind two have a mineral processing plant on as many as six different MOSP's sites. It makes much more sense to have one ( or several smaller) separation plants on each site and the minerals all go to one large minerals processing site ( CVV
Central Minerals Separation Plant) once separated. See page 6 of the PDF from the AGM . Note it is trucked there. Thats suggests there will be one central one only .
Titanium AGM Presentation ( see page 6) Therefore while each MOSP's engineering will be somewhat site specific these engineering deals all need to be done in relative conjunction with each other . COSIA and the goverment would also press for those same timelines. So I would expect Suncor and Syncrude would be at final stage discussions by now as well. The one oil sands exec mentioned the centrifuge to me so I know they must be quite advanced with Suncor. Its my best guess at least.
Make sense ?
Allisgood