RE:RE:Its official the 2.80 entry point is long gone for good !!!Really???
- There is a stark difference between a Larssen designed facility and a conventional greenhouse. They are designed to be efficient for operations in all extremes, including Siberia! So, what is the 'very, very big difference' ?
- Onboarding customers when there is a capacity issue is irresponsiible. Medicinal cannabis in cases, adjusts a persons well being and setting false expectations is unfair.
- ACB and Canopy are competitors. Have you forgotten that they commenced operations in January 2016? And Canopy started when? Of course they have an advantage, for now.
- Canopy has, at the expense of early investors, made bad decisions, like the Hershey location where they totally missed the mark as it relates to hygenic growing spaces. It costs investors considerably. Mettrum, justify that!
- Sandbagging investors? What cannabis company do you run?
Your inference that ACB has made bad decisions, like purchasing two profitable home grow equipment providers, is complete conjecture. If your not a fan of ACB, why are you even here?
Cremona wrote: You posed the question, what is difference between Canopy and Aurora?
You made some inaccurate comments. Canopy just signed some agreements with giant greenhouses in Vancouver and soon will have over 4.3 million square feet under glass producing. ACB picked a very cold place and is building state of the art facity that will have 800sqft and the other 50 and the other 45 or so in Quebec. Very very big difference.
You mentioned something about product line. Tweed wins awards and it and Bedrocan and all the Canopy brands are stellar. Aurora is good too. But their is no way you could say ACB is better, just not true.
Canapy takes all new customers. ACB refuses customer by the thousand every week. Because they do not have supply.
I could go on and on. But I will not... Canopy does not sand bag investors to play around with building pot carriers, or some other stupid things.