RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New Gross Margin Presentation. Greenhouses also give you the (mostly) full electromagnetic spectrum that you don't get with indoor growing. This could be a good or bad thing depending on the level of growing 'retardation' of the particular plants you're growing.
rcash1 wrote:
My opinion ,I defiantly wouldn't put WEED over ACB on a risk valuation Blue . Weed strategy is grand, I'll give you that . Weed is already operating sqft wise what ACB has planned ,and might I add with half the float fully diluted . The intangibles from the marketing/ distribution channels weed has made for recreational are untouched in this industry. It's going to come down to globalization and weed is winning there too,for now . Although I applaud APH for taking the risk to be in the USA , that first mover advantage may prove to be beneficial. It may also be on the top of that risk category. I own APH and have 0 fear of delisting, maybe spinoff for USA assets on the CSE worst case . More then likely just a formal disclosure like the sec was asking for in the first place . As for the greenhouse discussion Buck is out to lunch , and already has me on ignore for this . Greenhouses are being operated like indoor facilities with supplemental light and environmental controls . With the Benifit of cheap sunlight . The only drawback to greenhouses is the added cooling in the summer . This is why I bought stock in Supreme in 2014 and everyone is catching on now .The banter between the two boards is ridiculous. Many investors like myself own both stocks and many more in this industry. There will always be competition and discussion about the industry. Let's all try to be sportsman like though . Good luck to all investors in this industry....