Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canopy Growth Corp T.WEED

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.WEED.DB | CGC

Canopy Growth Corporation is a cannabis company. It delivers innovative products with a focus on premium and mainstream cannabis brands, including Doja, 7ACRES, Tweed, and Deep Space, in addition to category-defining vaporizer technology made in Germany by Storz & Bickel. The principal activities of the Company are the production, distribution and sale of a diverse range of cannabis and cannabinoid-based products for both adult-use and medical purposes under a portfolio of distinct brands in Canada. Its Canada cannabis segment includes the production, distribution, and sale of a range of cannabis, hemp, and cannabis related products in Canada. International markets cannabis segment includes the production, distribution, and sale of a range of cannabis and hemp products internationally. Storz & Bickel segment includes the production, distribution, and sale of vaporizers. This Works segment includes the production, distribution and sale of beauty, skincare, wellness and sleep products.


TSX:WEED - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Montevialeon Oct 22, 2017 2:36pm
77 Views
Post# 26842331

RE:RE:Here is what just happened this week...

RE:RE:Here is what just happened this week...Danocoats,

First I appreciate your feed back.  

Do you think TMX gets to make the final decsion or do you think Aphria has options should they not agree with the decision?

Do you think the TMX should be allowed to backtrack because of their oversight and if they are allowed to backtrack should they be required to pay damages for their negligent decsion?  

Acquiesence may be construed as consent in law.  

However, TMX did more than just remain silent on the issue, they actively enganged and approved Aphria's application.  It was more than TMX remaining silent while Aphria expanded into the US.  They recieved TMX's consent based on full disclosure being made by Aphria.  I will acknowledge the outcome might be differen if Aphria failed to disclose their activities, but based on what has been revealed to date, full disclosure was made.  

There are a number of precedents where an activity can be grandfathered in,  if it doesnt comply with current law.  Its done with zoning bylaws all the time.  And if you think about it, in its simpilist form, grandfathering a business in contravention of new zoning laws, is nothing more than allowing a certain activity to take place at a location that doesnt conform to existing laws.  

I think breaking the "law" is exaggerated.  No laws have been broken in Canada by Aphria.  

Not sure you can equate TMX policy with "law".  I doubt TMX policy is based on any set of laws passed by either provincial or federal legislatures.  In fact I would argue that TMX is basing their decsion on "self imposed policy"  that can vary from exchange to exchange.  That is why the CSE and TMX can have different policies concerning the same activity.  No law is being broiken.  

So if Aphria has broken no laws, complied with all listing requirements required by the TMX, has been doing business in the U.S. for three years and the TMX has approved their expanison into the U.S., do you honestly think the TSX should be able to simple say we now expect you to spin off your U.S. assets or we are going to delist you.  Do you really expect at first glance that a court having to make that decsion will rule in TSX's favour?  I honestly think grandfathering in Aphria is not only a viable option, but the only option unless the TSX decides to open the doors for everyone.  It will be interesting to see whcih route the TMX goes.  

M
Bullboard Posts