RE:RE:RE:RE:Well tex
That was a clever way to defame Dino Cremonese, Millman, and I find it curious why you would do this and be investing in any of his companies at the same time, if you really believed what you write. You say that "no one trusts" Mr. Cremonese and that this has caused Teuton to sell many of its properties. I trend to think that selling the properties has had more to do with having to pay bills. But what are you really saying?
First of all, who says that "no one trusts" Dino Cremonese anymore? No one? Have you taken a survey? What was your sample size? Of course, you could defame Mr. Cremonese and hope that people reading your words will run to their brokers to sell whatever stock they've acquired. I wonder who will be waiting with their bids to relieve this poor soul? Why are they there?
Secondly, no one is forcing you "to wait for the bids to go to at least 20 cents," so why are you waiting to sell? Why don't you sell right now and take your loss before the share price goes even lower? There are people waiting for you, like alligators beneath an egrit's nest. Surely if no one trusts Dino Cremonese and this inevitably dampens Teuton's future, there's no reason to invest in this company. So why are you waiting? Or do you believe that the share price will be going higher, in which case today's stock is a buying opportunity?
Thirdly, if Walter Storm and the people at American Creek are joint venturing with Teuton, are you saying that we should not trust these people, too? Of course you're not. Teuton and American Creek seized an opportunity that extracted themselves from a rather uncomfortable circumstance and Walter Storm seized an opportunity to acquire a 60% interest in what could be one of the great buys of all time.
Fourthly, we're waiting for lots of assays that could prove this possibility. Then what? If the share price goes to a dollar, are you going to say it should have gone to two were it not for the presence of Dino Cremonese? Try looking at the matter from the perspective of shareholders who invest in companies long-term. Success at Treaty Creek should have a beneficial effect upon the share price and at that time Teuton would be in a better position to raise funds and stay close to today's share structure. Conversely, were Teuton to have financed at, say, 20 cents, issuing 10 million units for a $2,000,000 drill program, the shareholders would have been diluted by about a third. Are we better off that way? Sure we are, if we're looking for quick hits and missing the big run. Or are we better off waiting for a better opportunity to finance with minimal dilution? I prefer this latter approach and, yes, I, too, am getting older.
It's easy to second guess people who have to make the decisions, but we also should keep in mind that waiting sometimes is the best strategy. We don't have to take the chances right now. We can wait for Tudor's assays. If they're bad, then we'll have a greater incentive to take the chances. If they're good, I wonder how ya'll be blaming Dino for getting in the way of even better success.