RE:RE:RE:RE:Now it gets interestingI don't see why volume is necessary for "true" or convincing consolidation? I also don't think judging trading activity based on NRs carries much weight. To me it tends to sound like people looking for clear explanations of market movements where none are factually discernible. I genuinely wish anybody looking for a lower entry good luck, one of my co-workers is in that boat with his "traders", but we have a juicy sidebet on the go, and i feel pretty solid on my end =D Let's just say there's a four course breakfast on the line.
Birdsplitter wrote: E
PrZinvesting wrote:
well the volume yesterday and today wasn't convincing and it was on news too, so wen u tink about it the stock hasn't really consolidate because of news (2 this week)
speaking of volume all the mj plays are having very low volume in the past 2-3 days
i do agree that CGC has come a long way since last year but i still feel that it needs to give a little before the next leg up
im not a bear or a bash love cgc and i want more shares
Agreed, I think the next big run is just after earnings.. not because of dislike but these oscillations need time. 5% down max from here and 95% up. We just need more time but close