RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:the natural merger partnerI thought the letter was very informative. What I got out of it was that there are various scenarios on how to run the company given a 2.00/GJ price. No capex could payback 226M in Debt and make 125M. A good option. Why go to the next option which increase profits by 50M but only payback 23M in debt. In essence, it will cost 203M to gain 50M in profits. Why increase production in a low price environment. As he stated "the cure for low nat gas price is low nat gas prices.
Peyto is expected to produce 3rd quarter profit of $.20/share on 102,000 BOE/D whereas Tourmaline is expected to produce$.11/share on 250,000 BOE/D. Who is the better operator?