RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:KL Team Confirms NOVO 85 KM Strike Of MineralizationTXRogers wrote: Wallstreet1112 wrote: TXRogers wrote: Wallstreet1112 wrote: ...... If they mean "real" strike with no 85km gap between two points, then holy moly.
That's what they mean. And the thicker the better. Let's hope those reefs swell up in thickness along the way. Tx
Jus to clarify TXRogers, you mean that the 85 km is "pure" strike length that they have actually mapped all the way?
Best regards
"Yes" to the first question. And probably "No, not completely" to the second question. Mapping is a variable term depending on your extent of definition. If defining it with drilling for sub surface spans and thicknesses. I think what were seeing is length dimension of a continuous day lighted or near surface reef extension. And how difficult could this really be to define considering they have had months to perform additional aerial photography and on-ground confirmations with geos on quad ATVs and high tech metal detectors. I have no doubt that these behind the scenes activities have been ongoing and unreported to the general public. You need to accept that there is additional "proprietary trade secret" info being compiled for use towards further business deals and acquisitions. Enough to make a sound geological assumption. That's why I have been adamant about not expecting drone footage from NVO while exploration is being performed near neighboring junior properties. More extensive and detail mapping (especially sub surface) will follow. That's what I am suggesting. Tx
Agree, the behind the scenes activity is something that shouldn't come as a surprise. No way that they would be satisifed sitting around at Purdy's all this time. And I have been very convinced that QH is downplaying this more than anyone involved (thus leaving it to us to figure out what is actually going on). But it sounds like what you are describing is the best case scenario for this news item... That they have in fact been on the ground and tracked 85 km of strike length on Novo's claims. If they have indeed at least sporadically confirmed it being gold bearing with metal detectors, then this is one hell of a bit of information!
Thanks for the lengthy answer TXRogers