RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:the natural merger partner
"revenue and production growth is only ONE metric I use to compare peyto and tourmaline. I measure them on MANY others. that is for another time and place. there is only so much numerical data this board can handle."
Sure this board can handle more numerical data….....You seem to post a lot on this board, and some of your posts are quite long.....Would you mind telling us some of the other metrics you use along with your numbers....?.......I put emphasis on Price-to-Earnings, Price-To-Cash Flow, Return on Equity, and Return on Capital......here's what I posted on another thread:
Taking a quick and dirty look at the numbers, according to my research (TMX Money, MSN Money, Yahoo Finance, Google Finance):
Both TOU and PEY have a trailing 12-month P/E of around 21.
Price to Cash Flow: TOU 6.16 PEY 5.79
5 Year Average ROE: TOU 3.80 PEY 8.57
5 Year Average ROC: TOU 3.60 PEY 6.19
PEY pays a generous dividend, TOU pays no dividend......PEY has the option of cutting / eliminating the dividend if they so choose....
Whether PEY is or is not a takeout candidate for either ECA or TOU, PEY has historically preformed far better than the others and I'd prefer to stick with it going forward.....