RE:Well, enough already ...PaulKing wrote: You know, I don't mind listening to opinions even if they are against mine. However, I do mind listening to opinions that are nothing but hot air. I have patiently awaited some facts from "Nopro-trading" and "silver goblet", but the facts parts seem to have been deleted before they hit "send" ... perhaps computer gremlins? So - failing any substance, I do two things: 1) they are blocked 2) I pose the question to the more adult parties - why have you not done so as of yet? Thanks for "listening"
Indeed!
So the company reported $250MM in growth capex since 2016 - they are seeing higher revenue and EBITDA growth as a result.
In a nutshell, they reported $72MM (up 20% Y/Y) which waas ahead of consensus of $67MM
Revs were $253MM (up 13% Y/Y) which was ahead of consensus of $238MM
More importantly, cash generation for the Q was sufficient to cover the company's total capital outlay - including the dividend.
Article in the G&M that talked about National Bank not lending stock is interesting - but I am missing something. Isn't it up to the broker whether they want to lend out stock and at what price they want to lend it at? Why are the shorts now screaming at the OSC for National Bank (allegedly) to have squeezed the stock. Tweep named @DonutShorts, retweeted by the chicken farmer). (Serious question, folks for the NON TROLLS - so please don't respond PRO, Silber and InsiderTrader).