RE:The NRZerosum wrote:
So they lead with hole 14 - sorry no assays yet but looks good and points the way to better things, instead of hole four (just received) in a regular table format, which every other junior does... that include with depths, grades, azimuths etc... which although narrow did hit nice grads. Either they like to shoot themselves in the foot of they want something and don't want to tip their hand. They had all weekend. If they thought Hole 4 was special enough to halt over the weekend then why bury the lead?
indeed, LOTs of information missing in the amateurish NR. I can`t believe Sprott, who took a PP
is not demanding full information NOW. So i wonder, are they giving all info to Sprott, and not to the public, that would be selective disclosure.
Anyone Thinks Sprott is fine with this NR?