Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Newstrike Brands Ltd NWKRF

"Newstrike Brands Ltd is a licensed producer and cultivator of medical cannabis based in Brantford, Ontario. The company cultivates and sells both forms including dried and fresh marihuana."


OTCPK:NWKRF - Post by User

Comment by Extallioneson Nov 20, 2017 3:00pm
120 Views
Post# 26998333

RE:RE:RE:RE:This is risky at .57 like it or not

RE:RE:RE:RE:This is risky at .57 like it or notI'm not clear on this "lock-up agreement", either.  I'm not convinced it actually prevents CMED shareholders from voting in favour of the HIP deal.  Generally speaking, lock-up agreements are intended to prevent shareholders from being able to SELL their shares to any other 3rd party who may want to acquire them - i.e. they're locked into selling their shares only to ACB.  However, HIP is not looking to purchase their CMED shares - HIP is being acquired by CMED, which is a completely different scenario - that I don't believe the lock-up agreement would have contemplated.  Obviously I can't be sure of that without seeing the agreements themselves, but that would be my understanding.  I don't think ACB has nearly as much power to stop this deal going through as people are suggesting.  Nor do they have as much chance of a hostile takeover if and when the deal does go through.   


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>