RE:RE:Something seems odd about today's news....Zerosum wrote:
It affects the timing of results and much more. And would be a complete waste of time if consistency is not maintained. You have to stay ahead of these things. He did the right thing.
QH stats consistency, integrity and recovery as being of concern. You can't conclude the results are accurate unless there’s consistency. Integrity is very important - remember Bri-X. No integrity. NVO, Integrity. I’ll take it. Recovery issue concerned me the most. Open source it - like Rob Mcewen did in Red Lake. With a reward to the engineer or geo / layman with the best solution.
As far as the email with otto goes —I think we can assume that if the bulk samples from here, there, and everywhere have >10 g/t it is likely ubiquitous and would certainly move the needle up. It’s why these samples need to have consistency, because that gets you integrity.
here here! * * * * *