Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Chinook Energy Inc. Common CNKEF



GREY:CNKEF - Post by User

Post by stockfyon Nov 28, 2017 6:46am
202 Views
Post# 27044202

CKE's Condensate-rich versus LXE's NGL and Valuation Gap

CKE's Condensate-rich versus LXE's NGL and Valuation Gap See first the absurd valuation gap between these two debt-free Montney juniors:

Leucrotta (LXE) (3,200 boepd with 73% natural gas) trades 
over $3,000/Montney acre, over $100,000/boepd, over $15/boe of 2P reserves and over 15 times the projected annual cash flow in 2018.

Chinook (CKE) (6,400 boepd in December 2017 with 75% natural gas) trades under $1,000/Montney acre, under $10,000/boepd, under $2/boe of 2P reserves and under 5 times the projected annual cash flow in 2018.


"JDavis17" alias, the resident troll and pathological liar with the 116 ignores in just 4 months with his latest 5th Stockhouse account (although some say that he has created at least 16 aliases over the last 7 years on SH with 7,000 ignores) is never tired of posting lies, although some are so easy to be detected. He alleged yesterday that:

JDavis17 wrote:   You really like to compare CKE to LXE, which is undoubtedly an expensive stock, but you refuse to acknowledge that LXE produces a lot of valuable light oil, and that their recent wells contain as much as 50% liquids.



See now the fact with only 27% oil/liquids as quoted from Leucrotta's (LXE) latest report:

Leucrotta’s Q317 production is estimated at approximately 3,000 boepd (27% oil and liquids).  Pricing for the quarter averaged approximately $1.57 per mcf for gas (versus $1.45 for Aeco) and $50.65 per barrel for oil and liquids (89% of Edmonton Sweet). Leucrotta is currently producing about 3,200 boepd with increases expected through Q4 as new wells come on-stream.



See also the facts about LXE's recent wells with the new completion design as quoted from the latest news, all of them have maximum 40% oil/liquids with a significant amount of it being cheap NGLs (butane, propane) and 0% high-priced Condensate (pentane):

" Leucrotta recently tied in and started producing the 8-4 Lower Montney Oil well.  The 8-4 well had an IP30 of 747 boepd comprised of 317 bopd of light oil, 2.2 mmcf/d of gas, and 60 boepd of ngls. Note that this well was completed with 28 fracs versus the recently released A8-22 well noted below that had 41 fracs."

" The A8-22 well has now produced beyond 90 days and had an IP90 of 838 boepd comprised of 254 bopd of light oil, 3.0 mmcf/d of gas, and 79 boepd of ngls."


" Leucrotta recently completed the A8-22 Lower Montney well utilizing a 58% increase in frac intensity. The new well was placed on production in late June and had an IP30 of 996 boepd comprised of 375 bopd of light oil, 3.4 mmcf/d of gas, and 60 boepd of ngls".
 


All these facts and results are here:


https://www.leucrotta.ca/

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>