RE:Frustration buildsIcarusonfire wrote: I'm starting to get a little peeved at Novo's PR department.
They come out today with a news release confirming that "agreements to allow heritage surveys to commence" are proceeding. Well woop de do! How does that improve on the NR from 11/16 where they state that "the NAC has committed to expediously prepare and execute heritage agreements"? Yes the sun came up again today!
We are going to tell you what we are going to do. Then we are going to tell you when we are going to do it in another release. Then we are going to tell you how we do it. Then we are going to tell you when we've completed what we told you we are going to do. THAT'S PRETTY POOR if this is one of QH's every two week news releases to keeping us informed!!!! Who turned off the lights when the meeting was completed? You forgot that one............
Now add to today's messy release, the cryptic, "Desired results from large diameter drilling not achieved". Hello? What were the desired results? and Why was it not achieved? What happened to cause you to discard a 2 million dollar drilling experiment. They leave this IMPORTANT little fact to our imagination with this NR.....
And we continue to spin our wheels on where was the bulk assay taken from in relation to the conglomerate bed? High? Low? First layer? sitting on the basement? We still don't have a definitive answer!!! Why haven't they told us something so simple???? It would answer a lot of questions for many of us!!!
You need to step up your game Novo!!!! We would all like some accurate actionable concrete information. Not fluff!
You do more damage than good with this garbage,
Icarus
Will they announce the results of drilling ?
Or the trenching will replace that ?
Even if drilling results are bad I would like to know what are the results...