RE:RE:RE:Frustration buildswaitingstill wrote: If you are talking about the 17.5 inch diameter drill results, I don't believe it is so much that they are "bad", just that they could not get meaningful data (ie reliable data) from them so I doubt they will report them.
That's the problem here. We finance them. Spending money and say aftwerward "no meaningful data" isnt right.
And what do you consider meaningful data ? If the drill results showed 100g /t would they think it is meaningful and publish it? Bad or good, we shareholder want to know more.
I'm starting to come to the conclusion that they will have to mine it to get either rich or broke. Seems the only solution. I might be wrong...