RE:RE:RE:Price calculation for hole 14Geoloss, you are the one who focused on the high grade lense and compared it to VB. If you use the the whole intercept including the lower grade ore, then the grades are no better than VB. I guess you did not want to show that?
VB hole 7 - 104m of 3.93% Ni, 2.84% Cu and .014% Co
GGi hole 14 - 40m of 3.93% Ni, 2.35% Cu and .092% Co
VB hole is 150% longer and closer to surface. I don't see how people can claim that GGI's results are better than VB.
From a mining perspective, the lower grade ore will be mined first, which means the payback period (if profitable) will be longer.