Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Co2 Solutions Inc COSLF

CO2 Solutions Inc is a Canada-based firm engaged in the development of proprietary technologies for capturing and producing of carbon dioxide. The company is focused on commercializing an enzyme-based technology for efficient CO2 capture from various industrial flue gasses for reuse or sequestration. The company's technology has various industrial applications, such as enhanced oil recovery, pulp and paper, water treatment, greenhouses, beverage carbonation, and other uses. Most of its revenue comes from the Canada market, while it also has a presence in the United States and European countries.


GREY:COSLF - Post by User

Comment by Co2Harveston Dec 12, 2017 5:31pm
57 Views
Post# 27142129

RE:RE:RE:Innovating in a silo

RE:RE:RE:Innovating in a siloI'm interested in anyone's thoughts on this too. Also, did Novak drop out of Xprize? Weird... and yet he's still getting press coverage? The Xprize site still lists Innovator Energy (last I checked, anyway). It will be a long wait until 2018 (2x scale up of Parahem) and 2019 (Serres Toundra comes online) but when the data starts to come in, but I imagine it will prove out everything that CST has shared so far about the cost effectiveness of their technology relative to other options out there. 

M101 wrote: Seems these energy terms are not directly comparable, but not uninformative either.
In 2015 CST claimed the best case for amines was 2.2 Gj/tonne but there was a study out then claiming 1.67 was possible, about 9:1 compared to CSTs parasitic load value.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie504617w?journalCode=iecred
While Novak is comparing reboiler energy at 1.39 to an MEA value around 13, again a ratio around about 9:1   
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00253
But CST´s data is bench scale tested from EERC where Novak´s is largely theoretical. 
And then there´s the unexplained dropping out of the X-prize hunt, objectively a clear win for CST.
And then there´s the RPB factor, Novak´s slow reaction doesn´t sound like it would scale up well.
Hope someone has thoughts on this.  


  


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>