RE:RE:RE:LeadershipI think it is safe to say that Booth is less tempered than Battley - he is not one to sit back and take it - which I have no problem with. No doubt both took Zettl's comments about Aurora personally (ie calling it paper money, overvalued, and backfilling with quality companies for 3 of many very offside comments). Booth made one comment in the Aurora release that some tenderfeet may be upset over - the, "it doesn't take a genius" bit, which I think shows a bit of emotion which, again, I am fine with but is not necessary - it is obvious that this is the case - you don't have to be a genius to see that the Newstrike deal is a bad deal. So if I understand your question, I think there are a couple of people that are horrified at this comment, as there was absolutely nothing else in the statement that anyone could take umbrage with. I was addressing their posts which tend to be very critical of Booth - I think unfairly - while painting Zettl as this charming town dandy, where he was the one flinging poo like a baboon on methamphetamine.
Hope that answers your q. Again, I think the statement was absolutely required for reasons I set out in other posts, and I think aside from that one comment was very objective and provided Cmed shareholders with legitimate facts they can check for themselves, something they would not be getting from their own company in this case.