RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Eric Sprot comments Agreed, though I think there will come a day, not too distant from today, where we'll thank QH for these unclear NRs for they provided us with shares more than 50% off the top.
Icarusonfire wrote:
Rhino10 wrote:
Obviously Novo now need to come out with a clear statement as nothing makes sense anymore.
Yes this is starting to feel like a rerun of the keystone cops! How does any competent company put out a NR and substitute alluvial with fluvial? And then not put out a second release immediately to correct the error...they just tell people over the phone????? How do they dump the theory (precipitation) without any explanation, take 11 meters of mineralization down to 1/2 meter without explanation, put out a 3d model that NOONE can understand, and on and on. Quinton might be a heck of a geologist, but he's been a lousy manager and communicator, and so is his head of communications!!!! He might be a nice guy. He might be a very honest guy. Unfortunately he is over his head. This is going to be a huge project, it's time for the entrepeneurs to step aside, and bring in some experienced, successful, professional, miners! I thought Humphreyson was that guy...I was obviously wrong!
Icarus