Alabama Graphite Corp. Com ABGPF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Realist2018

[nino9]

“I consider it better that Westwater hold Coosa as a hedge (against WW3 perhaps?) and use its precious capital instead to build only the PEA secondary processing facility to process readily available market graphite”

If you feel this way, why don’t you contact Westwater and propose your solution to them?

From a financial view point this seems a positive conclusion, from the mineral processing side it is not. You ignore one point I brought up before: Westwater may force you to redo all testing since the source material from the Coosa project was used. It is sometimes difficult to explain this to non-mining people.

I am not stating that this happens but when this happens the time gained and money saved with another source material might be completely lost.

You also completely ignore all the other benefits of the Coosa graphite project.as stated by me.

We expressed our views and had an interesting exchange of ideas going on. I have nothing to add anymore except one other point: we are not the decision makers, Westwater is.

So let us hope that their decision is to the benefit of ALL share holders instead of SOME share holders.