Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Peyto Exploration & Development Corp T.PEY

Alternate Symbol(s):  PEYUF

Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. is a Canadian energy company involved in the development and production of natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids in Alberta's deep basin. The Alberta Deep Basin is a geologic setting situated on the northeastern front of the Rocky Mountain belt in the deepest part of the Alberta sedimentary basin. It acquired Repsol Canada Energy Partnership (Repsol Assets), which included around 23,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day of low-decline production and 455,000 net acres of mineral land. The acquisition includes five operated natural gas plants with combined net natural gas processing capacity of around 400 million cubic feet per day, 2,200 kilometers (km) of operated pipelines, and a 12 MW cogeneration power plant. These assets include Edson Gas Plant and the Central Foothills Gas Gathering System. The Company has a total proved plus probable reserves of approximately 7.8 trillion cubic feet equivalent (1.3 billion barrels of oil equivalent).


TSX:PEY - Post by User

Comment by boarderex86on Jan 09, 2018 10:01pm
44 Views
Post# 27319511

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:LNG pipeline

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:LNG pipelineI would love to see your valuation to show what the share price will be when the futures are factored in so that the rest of us can appreciate your idea of fair price. The futures curve has been bad for a while now. It doesnt take an expert to understand that. I expect every buyer understand the situation at this point.
ceremony wrote: no this pipeline is not dead. nor is the Exxon LNG plan. Nor is the Shell LNG plan. they are not dead. they are on life support.  I would say SHELL has the best chance to go forward. I give it a 33% chance. And the biggest beneficiary is likely Tourmaline, which has a very very tight relationship with SHELL.

the crappy futures curve HAS NOT been fully factored into the prices of these stocks. at the current AECO futures curve all these producers are KAPUT. BK.

the first AECO contract priced Above $2/gj is December 2020. Most business plans today are based on $2.50/mcf CAD AVERAGE prices.

Yes things could change and likely will change. something has gotta give. But if you are invested in one of these companies, and can look at AECO future's prices and not feel sick to your stomach, you are not interpreting them correctly. these prices are Horrific for producers.

boarderex86 wrote: In my view, it is meaningful that TC made a point of acknowledging the pipe project is not yet dead. It would be dead if there wasnt ongoing discussion about an LNG terminal being constructed. This is not significant for current gas prices (construction must be 5 years on a plant like this) but the value of Montney / Deep Basin reserves would be much higher if an LNG project were coming on the Horizon. I would expect PPY would probably benefit the most from an announcement like that. Ceremony - someone once said that the markets are forward looking. The crappy futures curve has now been factored in by the market. You need to look to the future and consider what future circumstances will help WCSB producers turn the corner. LNG perhaps?
ceremony wrote: all transcanada has committed to here is Futher study. this "news" was released last thursday. and producer stocks have gone straight down since thursday. if anythng this news only highlights the intractable problems Canada faces in gettting an LNG project completed. Let's say by some miracle one actually gets approval and starts up. It will be several Years before gas is actaully shipped from them. I remember first reading about the exciting possibilites of CA LNG plants almost 4 years ago. Which happened to be when nat gas stocks Peaked.

 






Bullboard Posts