RE:LOI 124 for BAMM was a HOAX in the NR, not happening????mram wrote: Lets get on this and FIX this problem going FORWARD with this Management Group on this FORUM on such ISSUES,,,,,, any UNDISCLOSED AMOUNT is all a LOI is WORTH and NOT 124 when NO DD has been done.
This is our only place to fix it for the LITTLE SHAREHOLDERS,,,,TGIF or BAMM.
The LANGUAGE in that LOI has MISLED many here and since MJ is a HOT TOPIC,,, there was no need for SPELLING OUT 124 BAMM without any DD done.
That NR took TGIF and BAMM with a surprise OVER a DOLLAR for the 1st time.
DEMAND FREEBEE from SUTTON anf BAMMer CEO for the SPINOFF for MISLEADING SHAREHOLDERS of BOTH COMPANIES,,,,,,,,,this is not DONE !
Its done. That is all. Ty