RE:RE:Private PlacementIslandcr wrote: This really shouldn't be allowed, at the very least they should have to amend the filing as the price has been well above that .40 (more than double) for weeks. I could see if it was tied to a transaction / acquisition of something but it's clearly not according to the filing.
That's funny I felt the same way . I don't like the 50% discount . I do like the minimum dilution for $3.5 million though . This deal must have been in the works in early Dec late Nov . Would have been nice if they waited until licensed though . Could have hit +1$ on pp instead of .40 .My Guess is they need the $ for a acquiring of something. Big plans in the works , me thinks.