RE:RE:TINLEYSorry ... i was not equating him to a basher but i wrote it so fast the grammar does come off that way. I meant such statements can fuel bashing but in fact if there were a PP to fund a bottling facility that would be great news. Not disrepect intended ... just writing on the fly as the typos and grammar show. AND did not proof read before posting. Apologies ...
pungentaroma wrote: Interpolation2 wrote: Does anyone not remember when PUF in 2016 would have NR and after NR ... ,we are number 23 in the queue ... now 18 ... etc ... and I think they stopped when they claimed to be 13 and that was fall of 2016. AND how many new licenses have been issued since that time? We know TNY is in the queue for their inspection .... we know we are in a holding pattern on TNY27 pending that timetable.
There has been updates on the Hemplify side - new distrbutions, new packaging and formulation, etc. What else does anyone realistically expect? VIDA is the opposite ... a website with paid models in lab coats and stephoscopes all the whilte a full disclaimer page that no medical benefits have been clinically proven etc. Press Release after Press Release of their intentions. There is nothing with that either and shareholders have benefitted short term for sure from that PR. Tinely updates on actual news and actual contracts and always has. Had TNY been a PR machine and then suddenly went quiet (like PUF for example) maybe that would be cause of concern.
The bashers have now resorted to sounding the alarm that a PP is coming to pay for the bottling facility. So we should all dump APH, ACB, WEED, MJN etc becuase they announce PPs and with greater frequency? Truth is ... an equity financed expansion for a company with a healtny balance sheet and relatively low float .... these bashers want you to believe borrowing at 15% and giving up a stake in the company too is somehow preferred ... I own shares in EAT .... and sure I am pleased they got the temprorary license but look at their float, their debt, their financing cost etc. Not being critical of them as they too the short cut of buying an existing ... so it cost them to do so. Maybe the short cut and premium will be very rewarding for shareholders and I hope so as I am one mysellf ... but let's see what the next few weeks bring with Tinley with their by the book inhouse approach first.
But .... the bashing about a PP for a bottling facility nonsense ... what that means of course if one is to actually believe them is why would TNY need such a faciltiy for TNY27 .... unless ...... :)
See them for what they are .... for facts on any company go to their website, see their latest deck, go to SEDAR, go to SEDI. Come here for information and discussion and for news as warranted ...
Bashers, since when does bringing up an opinion make 1 a basher. Been here long enough to not wear that moniker.
Methinks he doth protest too much