Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Hiku Brands Company Ltd. DJACF

"Hiku Brands Company Ltd, formerly knwon as DOJA Cannabis Co Ltd is engaged in handcrafted cannabis production and building a portfolio of iconic, engaging cannabis lifestyle brands. Its cannabis brands include DOJA, Tokyo Smoke, and Van der Pop."


OTCPK:DJACF - Post by User

Comment by Jamanatronon Jan 22, 2018 5:37pm
103 Views
Post# 27411247

RE:Well that's not something most CEO's would want people sayin

RE:Well that's not something most CEO's would want people sayin
duediligence123 wrote: Jamanatron wrote:

Trent (CEO) had a plan for marketing and branding no matter what regulations the government puts in place

Not really sure you should be telling people that about Trent???  Remember, I'm not posting because I have a problem with Doja...I post to educate retail investors...and let them make informed decisions from actual news articles I can find, not just paid ads hyping a company.  I would not want to be left holding the bag, and I'm sure other investors would not want to either.  I do believe Doja, Tokyo Smoke, and that American Girly Cannabis company may be on to something here...I just need more real info

GLTA





Let me get this straight. You don’t think it’s important that a company who’s major focus is branding as a premium product be aware of the possible restrictions they might face in the future in regards to branding due to regulations decided upon in the future? That doesn’t make any sense. Would you rather a publicly traded company not look to the future for possible opportunities and setbacks???



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>