RE:RE:commisioning updateJCPenny where did you get your information?
According to the feasibility study they are using Taparko by SENET (Page 51)
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/1737G_-2015-3-1.pdf "some aspects of the process plant design were duplicated from the Taparko Gold Plant, currently operating in Burkina Faso. The Taparko plant was engineered by SENET, therefore HUM decided to use Taparko as a model in order to reduce the amount and cost of engineering design."
They mentioned looking at Gekko as an alternative but didn't use it, in
5.2.5 Alternative Processing Scenarios
Plus, their financial report also says they are using SENET:
"Engineering & Design Together with our Engineering, Procurement, Construction Management (“EPCM”) contractor, SENET, we have now completed all the detailed design drawings for the project, and under the guidance and leadership of Wayne Galea, our VP of EPCM, I am pleased that we have been able to make savings and efficiencies in this area by cutting out unnecessary steel and complications in the design which were present in the original DFS design."
Or are you just trying to scare people?
JCPenny wrote:
A testing time - after a long wait I finally I expect some value to get unlocked here. Watching the mill start-up with interest as I heard they are using the same Gekko process that failed to reach target recovery factor at TMAc's mine in Canada.