RE:RE:Excellent new post by Bernarduncleronstips wrote:
thanks zzthnx , I just re-read the post by Bernard. This Kevin / Kade1 guy is setting himself up for a date in court, and his cadre of bashers also. Exclusive, Napoleon, saint, stocknews ECT. This Kevin / kade1 is a known person, which is highly unusual in the world of BB slandering bashers. This crew has been outed and can't hide. So funny , the gang that couldn't shoot straight ! This educated weasel kade1 / kevin has linked himself to the bashing crew , and had the gall to attend the shareholder meeting , and then tour the PyroGenesis plant as an invited guest, meanwhile unbeknownst to management he was a competitor. Was he there to spy ? To gain inside info ? This is industrial espionage which is a crime. Way to go kade1 /Kevin. You may be an aerospace engineer but you sure ain't no spook. Lol. See you in court .
Uncleronstips
its interesting that you have not read my post that lead Bernard to claim I am a Basher.
I challenge you to read my post, perhaps even copy it and paste it here with highlights of the section that could be considered bashing.
My efforts are to Clarify what the Accurate PYR engineering reports are stating, but may not be too clear to shareholders, who deserve to understand where the project actually stands.
You will notice that Bernard did not explicitly answer my question related to the information extracted fro the PYR reports ( which must be correct) but in not answering his intent is clear.
I am a PYR shareholder and have been for some time, I was a shareholder of HPQ to the tune of 1.7 million shares but no longer hold any actual shares of HPQ but I still have 350,000 warrants at 24 cents.
I sold my HPQ shares not long after the AGM last year following some very detailed DD and research on various silicon manufacturing processes after several questions I asked went unanswered.
Until that point, I was fed quite a lot of information that I often posted on this board, which I now realize was mostly highly inaccurate information.
many personal friends bought into HPQ at very much higher levels than it is today.
My efforts are to clarify what the obviously accurate PYR reports are saying, that is all.
I am no Basher, never have been.
I have many patents and so have a great deal of experience at successfully solving technical problems in several different fields. Our Green Silicon manufacturing patent Is totally different to PUREVAP, is intended for licensing and is going to be offered to anyone who is interested.This invention was conceived long after the subject AGM as a direct result of the DD I performed after visiting PYR.
our patentability report is very positive.