RE:auroraNice to see Aurora have low cash costs.
How was GBG able to mine Hollister so consistently?
GBG went under due to their South African property development Burnstone - not at all due to Hollister. Cash burn was extreme in South Africa.
I. Why can't Huet replicate what GBG did with Hollister? Resource statement from end 2016 I believe still showed measured resources of 800,000 oz. of gold + II and more importantly. How did GBG mill the ore from Hollister? (obviously they didn't have the Midas Mill) Anyone know the answer to these 2 questions. This is obviously what is holding back SP.
JIN
JRafflesUK wrote: Aurora is reported to have a cash cost of $550/600, which is not far above Fire Creek's costs.
I initially regarded Aurora to be a give away when KDX spent $80m for the "jewel" at Hollister.
However, Aurora's cash costs are about half of those at Hollister!