Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lydian International Ltd T.LYD


Primary Symbol: LYDIF

Lydian International Ltd is a gold focused mineral development corporation engaged in exploring and developing precious metals assets located in Armenia and Georgia. Its main project is Amulsar Gold Project (Amulsar) in Armenia. It owns the Amulsar Project, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Lydian Resources Armenia. Amulsar is a compelling opportunity for a large scale, low cost operation utilizing open pit mining and conventional heap leach processing.


OTCPK:LYDIF - Post by User

Post by ClaraJameson Feb 07, 2018 3:41pm
46 Views
Post# 27521665

Amulsar project should not start։ What has Lydian hidden.

Amulsar project should not start։ What has Lydian hidden.Lydian acknowledges that the mine will produce ARD but lack sufficient, credible testing of the sources, amounts, rates of release or mitigation measures. There are significant contradictions with missing and inadequate information on the mineralogy, geochemical testing and modeling of surface and groundwater impacts. The geochemical assessment and modeling contains inadequate data on which to base planning for control of acid generation. No details on the geochemical modeling methodology are provided.

There are scientific inaccuracies. There is no evidence for the recurring statement justifying an incorrect conclusion of “mild” ARD. The samples chosen to justify this conclusion simply had low sulfide content whereas other samples produced strong acid (pH <3) in a few.


See more
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>