RE:so it is your positionNo that is not my position, and it never has been.
My position is that the general parameters of a deal are agreed and there is agreement amongst the relevant parties to vote in favour of an full agreement along those general parameters, subject to verification of the underlying facts, and completion of formal internal approvals and documentation, with each party agreeing to negotiate reasonably and in good faith with respect to any unaddressed details and the form and substance of the documentation. This is what they are doing, and it takes time.
This is the way these things are always done.
If there was any party that did not feel that things were moving in the proper direction, the matter would have been brought back to court by now. All that party has to do is deliver a 2-paragraph boilerplate notice 7 days before the proposed date and they are back in court. The fact that none has done so can only mean one thing: That none has determined it to be necessary or desirable to do so -- at least not yet. You cannot argue with that, rad10, it is not an opinion. It is irrefutable logic.