RE:RE:Hello Everyone,Re LicoThis analysis really resonates with me.
I admit that I am more tempted by the property in Chile, but I also admit it's hard to make sense of from a project management perspective. (Project management is basically my day job).
The need for institutional investment is a good point. It relates to the advertising, too. We need less retail investor chums like us, and more institutional investment to give the price some back bone.
On the point of too many properties (and therefore too many projects), you could point out that this problem was shared with Advantage Lithium and Lithium X, both of which sold their Nevada stakes (to Pure Energy) in order to consolidate into their flagship more (in South America).
It is probably an effect of starting out in a 'brainstorming' space of trying to get into the battery supply chain at the exploration and mining phase. And then winnowing down the focus from there.
That being said, this stock is called LiCo, which would make me believe there is some synergy here, but I'm not so sure. I simply don't know. It unfortunately positions too much as a retail stock from the start, because the connection between the two isn't really operational- it seems to be starting by noticing the similar investing space. Maybe learnings in one area can be shared with the other? Or maybe there is some networking synergy in finding offtake? That part of the story isn't clear. (To say the least).