Ivestorat - Pear3I am not an accountant so - and we do not know all the possible costs in the equation
I just wanted to point out that asked the web site be cleaned up - it is not complete.
I wanted to say there is exageration still there ..
Lets look at your own statement ( and boost it a bit because the sources quoted allow us to)
The Italian Reference says 320.4 Billion Kwh in 20117
Your work
“ At around 3 mwhrs per ton cost x 12 million tons utilizes 36 million megawat hours
which means power consumption savings if all the worlds arc furnaces were shutdown would be equivalent to italys power consumption. “
I will give you (cause the cited test paper says this) 3.3 MWh/t by 12.9 Million tonnes = 42,570,000,000,000 Whrs --- To get Kwhs divide by 1000
gives 42 .57 Billion Kwhs -- Not close to the Italian usage of 320.4Billion Kwh in the source
That is the point an exageration ... we do not need such.
There is amazing savings in the patent – IF you believe the statements – With this on the web site – IT is HARDER to believe – Doubt the statements on the patent - begin to enter ones head.
This is also the TOTAL energy used in the production of Ferro chrome (roughly) NOT the savings
This was the point - sorry I could not make it more clearly the first time
Jerry