Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fortune Minerals Ltd T.FT

Alternate Symbol(s):  FTMDF

Fortune Minerals Limited is a mining company. It is engaged in the exploration and development of mineral properties in Canada. It is focused on developing the NICO Cobalt-Gold-Bismuth-Copper Project in the Northwest Territories and Alberta that produces a bulk concentrate for shipment to a refinery that it plans to construct in southern Canada. It also owns the satellite Sue-Dianne copper-silver-gold deposit located 25 kilometers (km) north of the NICO Deposit and is a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO mill and concentrator. It also maintains the right to repurchase the Arctos anthracite coal deposits in northwest British Columbia. It also has a 100% interest in these 116 hectares of property south of Great Slave Lake with copper, silver, gold, lead and zinc showings. It has a 1% net smelter royalty covering 78 hectares of land positioned in a former silver mining district, located south of the Eldorado mining district at Great Bear Lake.


TSX:FT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by cwDeicion Mar 02, 2018 6:21am
170 Views
Post# 27649657

RE:RE:questions

RE:RE:questions
Correction (sorry for triple post): the mine is 3 years away. It'll start construction early next year, best case, and take 2+ years. Road should start next winter and reliably last 4 years. Also, the combined costs are slightly over 700m, but the CAD is stronger, so who knows without the actual plans. As regards the Golden Giant Hemlo Mill and current refinery plans, the 18m (2007 dollars) cost for the Hemlo Mill included dismantling and transportation and was later sold for below 0.5m. The last few years Goad has gone from a large refinery using second hand parts to a brand new refinery to a brand new extra size refinery to refine surplus cobalt from others at a profit... So much mission creep and you can just smell the desperation of a man who wants a final, massive success that undoes everything before. I looked up refinery costs, and the one I found quickly was Ecobalt, which is going at 180m or so, or 280m including dismantling and other costs. I am -not- happy about taking three times the risk necessary for what's a moderate advantage over modulary expansion. Take a hint from Ardea Resources. Maybe Canadian regulation is bad at dealing with modulary expansion, but even so I'd be happy with a smaller refinery. I sincerely doubt success would see more than a low double digit percentage difference between a large and medium refinery, and a 200m dollar refinery would be much easier for everyone to accept, especially from a company with a fairly long and bad history. Given 20 years of failure, as a CEO would you want to take your FANTASTIC resource and ask investors for a Moderate or HUGE sum of money? That said at the end of the day this is an extremely attractive project. The road is great, the refinery should be top class, the resource is fantastic. Even the questionable leadership is mitigated by the long-term work. The only things to really worry about is the macro, what financing might look like, how long this will take given Canadian red tape, and how long cobalt will be an essential component in stable batteries before some work-around is found that adequately serves mass production. These may sound like major risk factors, and they are, but risk is an unavoidable factor in junior companies poised for massive profits. Fortune Minerals is far less risky than similar companies, with a few exceptions. That said I would definitely diversify. DYDD, only my personal thoughts.
Bullboard Posts