RE:RE:RE:Pilot Plant MathWow great response, keep bashing AMY. You provide no objectivity. You provide no facts. You are an internet troll who 5-stars his own posts, and your donkey profile picture is poetic.
I was simply trying to state that AMY gets 100% on lithium, cobalt, manganese, and nickel right now in small batch testing, IF this technology isn't scalable they can take what they have now and multipy it out and have many small units/plants to achieve the same result. You are stating like it's fact that competitors have successfully achieved scaled up plants, have run the tests, have 100% recoveries?!? Please enlighten us all. Show us the facts. We wait with bated breath.
And while you're at it you still haven't answered my questions (and others) from before:
Prove that Neometals (or other competitors) patents are different and don't infringe on AMY?
What are their recovery rates?
What recoveries do they get on lithium? cobalt? manganese? nickel?
Why haven't they disclosed their process to the public if they have patents filed already?
Why haven't they been invited to industry leading conferences to present their processes?
How will they get batteries to recycle if they don't have contracts with car manufacturers?
Why does Samsung mention AMY and not Neometals as industry leaders?
As for the grants, I didn't state it was a certainty, I said and I quote, "we are at the mercy of government approval." Do you even read? Or just began to angrily type responses to me when you see my name? The 155mil Clean Growth Program (which I linked) was just announced in November, and the grants received previously were from a different program where more companies could apply and less funding was available. But again you have an agenda to push and facts don't matter to you.
JUST MY THOUGHTS.