RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:looking good..Duff Have you deliberately distorted the order in which things transpired? I was very gung ho on HPQ based on what I was told by management. I became disillusioned after taking a first hand look, and asking several technical questions. I then sold my shares, and stopped posting. I then answered the questions I had asked by doing some detailed research on all the existing patents around Quartz to Silicon processes. I then applied for a patent for an entirely new process, that has nothing in common with any existing patent or published patent application, including the PUREVAP(R) process. some of the questions I have previously asked are now also being asked by others, which I support being answered. I was labelled a Basher for publicly asking direct questions of Bernard on another discussion forum, he also made the assumption and accusation that I was trying to steal his investors. I do not need his investors. Ask yourself why would Bernard, a CEO, call me a Basher rather than answer the simple question I asked.....? His investors should be interested in the information I was seeking to confirm. Unless of course its bad news. All My Honest Opinion. KD
dufjam wrote: Kade, you are a smart guy. And you used to be gung-ho on HPQ like no other. But after selling your position and entering into direct competition with HPQ (after getting a sneak peak at PYR work under NDA), your point of view has become inherently, and obviously biased. We all have our biased opinions, but it's starting to sound like you are in denial of your own obviously biased position here, and the obvious implications of your support for the "suicide crew".
D.
kade1 wrote: MrsEastend wrote: Do you honestly believe that applies here kade? Are these guys doing DD? A question can be false in the sense that the motives behind those questions imply a negative answer 100% of the time. Truthful information coming to light is exactly what is being buried under these "DD" questions. The black and white truth and false you're talking about here is incorrect.
And this honesty you speak of seems a little off, aren't you developing your own process to produce silicon metal? Seems awfully fortuitus that the users you interject your opinion with are the ones who align with what you're trying to accomplish.
Honesty is a funny thing on the internet eh?
Do you honestly believe that applies here kade? Are these guys doing DD? A question can be false in the sense that the motives behind those questions imply a negative answer 100% of the time. I do honestly believe this applies directly here, show me an example of your false question which implies a negative answer 100% of the time where the truthful reply does not imply a negative answer. Truthful information coming to light is exactly what is being buried under these "DD" questions. Show me what you are saying here is true. And this honesty you speak of seems a little off, aren't you developing your own process to produce silicon metal? Seems awfully fortuitus that the users you interject your opinion with are the ones who align with what you're trying to accomplish.
Yes my company has indeed been involved in developing such a process as several other companies I know of have also been working in the same area, some are far ahead of others, and no one else who posts on this board is involved in my company in any way. What has this got to do with Honesty? (I guess you bought the implied relationship from Bernards implications, shame on you for getting sucked in).