HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Alternate Symbol(s): HPQFF

HPQ Silicon Inc. (HPQ) is a Canada-based technology company specializing in green engineering of silica and silicon-based materials. The Company is engaged in developing, with the support of technology partners PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (PyroGenesis) and Novacium SAS, new green processes to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions. Its activities are centered around the three pillars: becoming a green low-cost (Capex and Opex) manufacturer of Fumed Silica using the Fumed Silica Reactor, a proprietary technology owned by HPQ being developed for HPQ by PyroGenesis; becoming a producer of silicon-based anode materials for battery applications with the assistance of Novacium SAS, and Novacium SAS is engaged in developing a low carbon, chemical base on demand and high-pressure autonomous hydrogen production system. The Company operates in a single operating segment, segment, being the sector of the transformation of quartz into silicon materials and derivative products.

TSXV:HPQ - Post by User

HPQ Silicon Inc

Bullboard Posts

Comment by dufjamon Mar 09, 2018 6:33pm

116 Views

Post# 27695070

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:looking good..

Kade - the order of what I wrote is irrelevant. - You were gung-ho on HPQ - You got a tour of PYR under NDA - You sold all your shares - You are now in direct competition with HPQ/PYR. You can re-order that sequence anyway you like, the end result is the same. Deliberately distorting info is the expertise of others on this board.

My point was that it is a huge stretch to think your posts on Agoracom, and your recent posts here, come from a place of objectivity and honest truth when you are clearly in direct competition with HPQ/PYR and are supporting the efforts of notorious bashers in both explicit and implicit ways (which I don't think needs elaborating on).

We don't need to debate, I respect things I have learned from you in the past, but as new eyes are on this board and people are considering investing I felt compelled to give a little context from my point of view, pumper or whatever I am.

If you are truly shopping your own quartz to silicon invention around, doesn't it look unprofessional that you are popping up on HPQ forums asking and influencing loaded questions?

No disrespect, I am just a concerned HPQ shareholder with my own real money invested, and I continually do my own DD as well.

D

kade1 wrote: Duff Have you deliberately distorted the order in which things transpired? I was very gung ho on HPQ based on what I was told by management. I became disillusioned after taking a first hand look, and asking several technical questions. I then sold my shares, and stopped posting. I then answered the questions I had asked by doing some detailed research on all the existing patents around Quartz to Silicon processes. I then applied for a patent for an entirely new process, that has nothing in common with any existing patent or published patent application, including the PUREVAP(R) process. some of the questions I have previously asked are now also being asked by others, which I support being answered. I was labelled a Basher for publicly asking direct questions of Bernard on another discussion forum, he also made the assumption and accusation that I was trying to steal his investors. I do not need his investors. Ask yourself why would Bernard, a CEO, call me a Basher rather than answer the simple question I asked.....? His investors should be interested in the information I was seeking to confirm. Unless of course its bad news. All My Honest Opinion. KD

dufjam wrote: Kade, you are a smart guy. And you used to be gung-ho on HPQ like no other. But after selling your position and entering into direct competition with HPQ (after getting a sneak peak at PYR work under NDA), your point of view has become inherently, and obviously biased. We all have our biased opinions, but it's starting to sound like you are in denial of your own obviously biased position here, and the obvious implications of your support for the "suicide crew".

D.

kade1 wrote:

MrsEastend wrote: Do you honestly believe that applies here kade? Are these guys doing DD? A question can be false in the sense that the motives behind those questions imply a negative answer 100% of the time. Truthful information coming to light is exactly what is being buried under these "DD" questions. The black and white truth and false you're talking about here is incorrect.

And this honesty you speak of seems a little off, aren't you developing your own process to produce silicon metal? Seems awfully fortuitus that the users you interject your opinion with are the ones who align with what you're trying to accomplish.

Honesty is a funny thing on the internet eh?

Do you honestly believe that applies here kade? Are these guys doing DD? A question can be false in the sense that the motives behind those questions imply a negative answer 100% of the time. I do honestly believe this applies directly here, show me an example of your false question which implies a negative answer 100% of the time where the truthful reply does not imply a negative answer. Truthful information coming to light is exactly what is being buried under these "DD" questions. Show me what you are saying here is true. And this honesty you speak of seems a little off, aren't you developing your own process to produce silicon metal? Seems awfully fortuitus that the users you interject your opinion with are the ones who align with what you're trying to accomplish.

Yes my company has indeed been involved in developing such a process as several other companies I know of have also been working in the same area, some are far ahead of others, and no one else who posts on this board is involved in my company in any way. What has this got to do with Honesty? (I guess you bought the implied relationship from Bernards implications, shame on you for getting sucked in).