RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Knight to Participate in Crescita Rights Offeringrtftech16 wrote: I base my investments on a company’s financial position, not what may or might happen. Based on their balance sheet I do not feel confident investing in them more than the small amount I have in them currently
But thats not true. You're investing in GUD based on Goodman's ability to deliver long term growth, thats definitely something that "might happen". You're "gambling" on the future. Goodman may not be at GUD long term in which case your reason for investing is dead. Isn't all investing gambling, if you want to see it that way? What you seem to be talking about is risk/reward profile, Just because GUD and ATE have very different risk/reward profiles doesnt make one a gamble and the other not a gamble.
I think most people share your long term vision for GUD, I just think they would also like to see some short term protection for there investments. We arent garenteed the perfect long term scenario, some insurance would be nice. Imagine Goodman resigns tomorrow, your raison d'etre for being in GUD is gone and the SP is weak, thats not a health spot to be in.
Its hard to argue that deal doing has been low at GUD. He doesnt have to spend the whole hoard just enough to give the impression that something is happening and that revenue is on an upward trajectory.