RE:For what it's worth ...........5: this poster that is so well informed and presents a knowledgable argument on the financials is likely short if not a paid poster.. The paid posters come accross like they actually know something.. It's all part of sowing doubt.. read between the lines and take it as a buying opportunity..
Stockmoves1:
I suppose you are referring to me. Correct? If so, I would encourage you to present valid counterarguments to the concerns I raised in this post
https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/c.uav/global-uav-technologies-ltd?postid=27704502 instead of disseminating utter nonsense as per your above comment.
Don’t make the oh so common chat line mistake of confusing objectivity with some sort of (evil) agenda.
At the risk of repeating myself ... I do like UAV as a concept. I just do NOT like being led down the proverbial garden path in terms of financial reporting.
Fact is, these guys have no clue in terms of running a
public company / timely disclosure.
They need to bring someone on board to fill this void if they want a fighting chance in the public market.
BTW, no one but some slightly crazy institutional trader would short a nano cap like UAV.
Promising nano caps are a dime a dozen. Trust and credibility is what builds shareholder value.
The 3 P’s:
- People
- Product
- Profitability
Right now they only have #2.
Fixing #1 would easily double or triple UAV’s valuation.