PINL:GRPOF - Post by User
Comment by
RogueGeekon Mar 15, 2018 3:13pm
70 Views
Post# 27722540
RE:RE:RE:RE:MANIPULATION
RE:RE:RE:RE:MANIPULATIONAnother thing to consider is our wonderful, and ever so smart, Prime Minister Captain Crayons. His party has gone out of their way to decimated businesses in Candada. Why would anyone want to invest in a Canadian company when were so close to becoming a 'sh$thole' has Trump would put it?
Also I'm not sure how smart it was to annouce that they are going to postone the comencing of revenue until Sept. Thats the 1 thing that would have brought new investors. Anyone doing their DD would see this and might get turned off or in the very least come back to it in the fall and see where its at. That may have even convinced those that have been holding for a long time to say 'screw it' sell now and return in the fall when its dipped back to the 80s hopefully not but maybe even the 70s again.
LeafRider wrote: Nicely put Fog, I'm with you on this one all the way. These yuppies come in here like they know the system after looking at a chart for 20 seconds, then proceed to beak those who are actually watching this stuff, and we're left to validate our comments.
All we can do is keep reporting it, if we report it and they find something fishy going on, maybe someone gets their hand slapped and they move on to screw another company around. What gets me is that Tetra's management stands by and watches it happen. I can gaurantee you that Anne-Sophie (VP of Marketing and Communications) sure isn't going to pick up on it. I'm not even sure why she's on the payroll at the moment.
We have the 1st ever FDA approval of a cannabis based drug (in any capacity) and we slide out the NR like we frying chicken for lunch. Wtf that means I don't know, but to see this company in the same light after Q1-2018 then where we were a year ago, is a slap in the face, I'm confident there's an entity or group of entities trying to hold this one back.
My theory is it has something to do with big pharma, or someone hired by big pharma. If you were in the opioid business would you not want to keep this one held back as long as possible, and then once phase 3 clinical data comes out on the flagship drug, just swoop in and get this thing at $2 instead of $5... If we're bought on the cheap, I will say I told you so. Something doesn't seem right through all of this. TER is my comparitive and both were 70s about a year ago, but one hits $5 today, Tetra, well we'll probably head to the 80s until November and then hopefully luck out and go on a run with the rest of the sector.
Fogcity87 wrote: Selling 500 shares in the last sec when someone just bought 100000 shares up to 1.06 isn't liquidating shares. It's downticking and it's illegal and it's everyday. When it's used it can do all kinds of things, if today is neg it breaks chart vs a close of 1.06 where a neg day would be in line. 3 cents when you hold a 100000 shares can make a huge deal. Plus instead of this opening at 1.05 or 1.06 today it will open at 1.03 most likely which was the goal. Having shorts and longs in a market is healthy but is not healthy when the shorts in acts techniques such as downticking and abusive naked shorting like has been the case since the dropped off from 1.70 to 70 cents. I bet those who bought in the upper range don't feel to great about the trading that occurs on the stock. This sort of trading wasn't occuring when we were depressed in the 60's for so long. The shorts kept it depressed and it was frustrating but there was no obvious ominous trading. That is not the case anymore and it's too coincidental that it always occurs from a 001 account. In any case good luck to all with their investment