RE:RE:Fuel To Run on!a couple of extra thought to mull over. in my experience, just a few yrs ago, i had interviewed blake and let him know that i was going to post his answers on this board, which i did. i got 1 star for that effort. and we got a bunch of "we have to verify" all this type of bull. none ever did question my accuracy afterwards, athough they immediately questioned the source (me). months later, what blake said came to fruition, at that point in time.
just this last year i got tim to answer a question about the reverse split. i typed him in verbatim (which he requested and i respected).
i believe my tract record preceeds my posts.
what i write about now has no difference, except for my opinions, as to what i see our investment leading too. i even give realistic successful scenarios. if some consider it negative, so be it.
do better, please. who else can get tim AND blake to say something on this board.
once again, i only care about the $$.
what else is important?