Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Alexandria Minerals Corp ALXDF

Alexandria Minerals Corp is a Canadian based gold exploration and development company. Its project consists of Orenada, Akasaba, Sleepy, Manitoba and Ontario properties together with the Other Quebec properties. It is mainly focused on exploring the cadillac break property which is located in Val-d'Or, Quebec. The cadillac break property consists of approximately 21 contiguous projects of over 460 claims, located in Bourlamaque, Louvincourt and Vaquelin Townships. The manitoba properties include


GREY:ALXDF - Post by User

Post by Goodbadanduglyon Mar 17, 2018 7:49pm
183 Views
Post# 27734668

More elaboration: Take-over bids vs Plans of arrangement

More elaboration: Take-over bids vs Plans of arrangement

Take-Over Bids

Advantages

  • If it is a friendly transaction supported by the target company’s board, the transaction can be completed is as few as 35 days (i.e. the target board can approve a shorter 35 day minimum bid period rather than the mandated 105 day minimum bid period for hostile bids).
  • There is no court approval process and therefore there is no formal venue for disgruntled shareholders or other parties to intervene.

Disadvantages

  • If the acquiring company wants to acquire 100% of the target company’s shares, a second step transaction is required to acquire any shares not tendered to the original bid.
  • The long 105 day minimum bid period (unless target board approves a shorter time of not less than 35 days) increases the risk of completing bids.

Plans of Arrangement

Advantages

  • Plans of arrangement are more flexible and can allow the parties to achieve multiple goals (including tax efficiency) in a single transaction.
  • Complicated, multi-step reorganization transactions can be completed quickly and efficiently under plans of arrangement (usually in the same day).
  • Plans of arrangement allow for the termination of options and other convertible securities (provided the holders of such securities are treated fairly).
  • Plans of arrangement have a lower approval threshold in that the transaction only requires the approval of two-thirds of the target company shares that actually vote on the transaction.
  • If the requisite shareholder approval is received, the acquiring company can acquire 100% of the target company shares (including from both those that voted in favour and those that voted against the transaction) in a single step transaction.
  • The issuance of shares of the acquiring company in exchange for the target company shares pursuant to a court approved plan of arrangement fit within a registration exemption under US securities laws.

Disadvantages

  • The shareholder approval process takes longer (typically 60+ days) than the 35 day minimum bid period under a friendly take-over bid.
  • The court approval process provides a venue for disgruntled shareholders, and other interested parties, to intervene.
  • Courts typically require dissent rights to be given to the target company shareholders (i.e. the right to be paid out the fair value of their shares in cash).
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>