Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

THC Biomed Intl Ltd C.THC

Alternate Symbol(s):  THCBF

THC Biomed Intl Ltd. is a Canada-based cannabis producer. The Company’s principal business is the production and sale of cannabis through THC BioMed Ltd., which is a small batch Licensed Producer as regulated by the Cannabis Act which regulates the production, distribution, and possession of cannabis for both medical and adult recreational access in Canada. The Company’s biological assets consist of cannabis plants (mother plants and clones for growth); resin; oil; harvested marijuana flowers prior to completion of the drying, grading and testing processes; and edible concentrate. The Company operates in a single reportable segment being the cultivation and sale of cannabis. Its subsidiaries include THC BioMed Ltd., Clone Shipper Ltd., THC BioMed Victoria Falls Ltd., THC2GO Dispensaries Ltd. (THC2GO), and THC BioMed Lesotho Ltd. (THC Lesotho). Clone Shipper Ltd. owns all rights to the Clone Shipper product used to transport live plants.


CSE:THC - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by NewDonaldKnowson Mar 19, 2018 8:17am
11 Views
Post# 27738015

RE:RE:RE:RE:AWW SILVERSTOCK ARE YOU PART OF ORGANIZED CRIME?

RE:RE:RE:RE:AWW SILVERSTOCK ARE YOU PART OF ORGANIZED CRIME?One report from a Republican-led committee in the House of Representatives released this month said the St. Petersburg troll factory, members of which now face criminal charges in the U.S.


NewDonaldKnows wrote: Click here to read about RUSSIAN TROLL FARMS, and others



NewDonaldKnows wrote:
NewDonaldKnows wrote:

Russian troll farm that meddled in U.S. election also took swipes at Canadian oil

NewDonaldKnows wrote: With illegal marijuana profits about to shrink 50% or more, what will all the criminal employees do for work?? I believe they are infiltrating the public stock arenas to make defamation and fear gangstering a daily occurence against good public companies and good honest investors. 
CRIMINAL CODE, CANADA, 1985

Certain omissions not grounds for objection

 No count in an indictment is insufficient by reason of the absence of details where, in the opinion of the court, the count otherwise fulfils the requirements of section 581 and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, no count in an indictment is insufficient by reason only that

  • (a) it does not name the person injured or intended or attempted to be injured;

  • (b) it does not name the person who owns or has a special property or interest in property mentioned in the count;

  • (c) it charges an intent to defraud without naming or describing the person whom it was intended to defraud;

    Sufficiency of count charging libel
    •  (1) No count for publishing a blasphemous, seditious or defamatory libel, or for selling or exhibiting an obscene book, pamphlet, newspaper or other written matter, is insufficient by reason only that it does not set out the words that are alleged to be libellous or the writing that is alleged to be obscene.

    • Marginal note:Specifying sense

      (2) A count for publishing a libel may charge that the published matter was written in a sense that by innuendo made the publication thereof criminal, and may specify that sense without any introductory assertion to show how the matter was written in that sense.

    • Marginal note:Proof

      (3) It is sufficient, on the trial of a count for publishing a libel, to prove that the matter published was libellous, with or without innuendo.


 

 




Bullboard Posts