RE:RE:RE:RE:AWW SILVERSTOCK ARE YOU PART OF ORGANIZED CRIME? CRIMINAL CODE, CANADA, 1985
Certain omissions not grounds for objection
583 No count in an indictment is insufficient by reason of the absence of details where, in the opinion of the court, the count otherwise fulfils the requirements of section 581 and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, no count in an indictment is insufficient by reason only that
-
(a) it does not name the person injured or intended or attempted to be injured;
-
(b) it does not name the person who owns or has a special property or interest in property mentioned in the count;
-
(c) it charges an intent to defraud without naming or describing the person whom it was intended to defraud;
Sufficiency of count charging libel
-
584 (1) No count for publishing a blasphemous, seditious or defamatory libel, or for selling or exhibiting an obscene book, pamphlet, newspaper or other written matter, is insufficient by reason only that it does not set out the words that are alleged to be libellous or the writing that is alleged to be obscene.
-
Marginal note:Specifying sense
(2) A count for publishing a libel may charge that the published matter was written in a sense that by innuendo made the publication thereof criminal, and may specify that sense without any introductory assertion to show how the matter was written in that sense.
-
Marginal note:Proof
(3) It is sufficient, on the trial of a count for publishing a libel, to prove that the matter published was libellous, with or without innuendo.
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=c.thc&postid=27738009#sS4sKvb1SAqXREyX.99 NewDonaldKnows wrote: Click here to read about RUSSIAN TROLL FARMS, and others NewDonaldKnows wrote: NewDonaldKnows wrote: NewDonaldKnows wrote: With illegal marijuana profits about to shrink 50% or more, what will all the criminal employees do for work?? I believe they are infiltrating the public stock arenas to make defamation and fear gangstering a daily occurence against good public companies and good honest investors.
CRIMINAL CODE, CANADA, 1985
Certain omissions not grounds for objection
583 No count in an indictment is insufficient by reason of the absence of details where, in the opinion of the court, the count otherwise fulfils the requirements of section 581 and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, no count in an indictment is insufficient by reason only that
-
(a) it does not name the person injured or intended or attempted to be injured;
-
(b) it does not name the person who owns or has a special property or interest in property mentioned in the count;
-
(c) it charges an intent to defraud without naming or describing the person whom it was intended to defraud;
Sufficiency of count charging libel
-
584 (1) No count for publishing a blasphemous, seditious or defamatory libel, or for selling or exhibiting an obscene book, pamphlet, newspaper or other written matter, is insufficient by reason only that it does not set out the words that are alleged to be libellous or the writing that is alleged to be obscene.
-
Marginal note:Specifying sense
(2) A count for publishing a libel may charge that the published matter was written in a sense that by innuendo made the publication thereof criminal, and may specify that sense without any introductory assertion to show how the matter was written in that sense.
-
Marginal note:Proof
(3) It is sufficient, on the trial of a count for publishing a libel, to prove that the matter published was libellous, with or without innuendo.