OTCPK:LYDIF - Post by User
Post by
entrdisplaynameon Mar 21, 2018 8:28am
27 Views
Post# 27751747
This is my re-post from 03/09/2018.
This is my re-post from 03/09/2018. Lydian International shareholders respond to concerns
https://armenpress.am/eng/news/924229/lydian-international-shareholders-respond-to-concerns-of-armenian-nature-protection-activists.html
"Lydian International also responded to the accusations and said that they have accepted the Armenian government’s invitation to meet and hold discussions with the authors of the reports criticizing the Amulsar project, but the latter have refused to participate in the discussion."
NOT TRYING TO START AN ARGUMENT but why have they refused?
To be completely impartial it sounds like LYD has answered/done everything they've needed to but yet there doesnt seem to be a valid argument from the opposing side. I'd understand the uproar is LYD dodged every question and refused to meet but thats clearly not the case.
For anyone whos going to repsond, please provide facts and not the standard "its bad for the environment post".
I am reposting this because I have seen alot of posters who are negative on this stock but I've yet to see a response to my question/this article. Im not blind to see alot of mines do have negative impacts on the environment but if the opposing side is unwilling to meet, to a completely third party this would make it seem like they're hiding and making up stuff... does it not?